Buddhism is a religion pretty centrally concerned with
suffering. It never really stops studying the suffering of oneself and that of
other people. These form a central focus of the religion, its practice and its
philosophy. One is encouraged to explore what suffering is, the various forms
it comes in and their root causes. Though they can all be reduced to
attractions and aversions based upon the illusion of a real self, which desires
certain things and is averse to others, yet this is not immediately obvious or
a point easily grasped:
"And the people, who hide themselves behind a wall of
illusion
Never glimpse the truth, then it's far too late, when they
pass away."
[George Harrison, Within you without you, 1967]
The Theravada tradition primarily emphasises ethical
conduct, mindfulness and self-restraint, which aim at achieving enlightenment,
probably after many future lifetimes. The Mahayana tradition primarily
emphasises the attainment not just of enlightenment, but also of full
Buddhahood. This subtle difference means training not just to gain insights and
personal release from Samsara, but also to actually become a Buddha, a fully
enlightened being who compassionately helps others through their lives to
attain wisdom and realisation. In the Mahayana, the emphasis is upon becoming a
bodhisattva, which is a Buddha-to-be who strives for the enlightenment of
others ahead of his or her own. The Tantrayana comprises Mahayana paths that
aim to achieve full Buddhahood in this lifetime.
In the Mahayana Zen tradition, the rather ruthless
destruction of the self through reflection, passivity and self-denial is the
fruit of a life of great discipline, simplicity and focus. In this way, it aims
to achieve perfection of mind control and ethics through the exhaustive
realisation of emptiness and mental stillness:
"The farther one travels
The less one knows."
[George Harrison, The Inner Light, 1969]
"We're just two lost souls swimming in a fish bowl,
year after year,
Running over the same old ground.
What have we found?
The same old fears."
[Pink Floyd Wish you were here, 1975]
It is true to say that Buddhism begins and ends in the study
of suffering. This lies at its root just as it lies at the root of life itself.
We are born into suffering - "like a dog without a bone, into this life
we’re thrown" [The Doors] – and we all must die and experience pain and
loss. Obviously, we also experience great joy as well, but suffering seems to
be a dominating influence of all life and in our lives. Buddhism concerns
itself very much with the study of suffering in all its forms, what it is, how
it arises and how its causes might be cut, overpowered or transformed into a
life-plan that minimises suffering coming into being, by cutting off its causes
within one’s life, attitudes and behaviour. In this way, a ‘new life’ can be
forged when effort and determination are harnessed to the task. Real change and
real improvement are only possible when great effort is made at the right
tasks. Such are the schools and paths of Buddhism. It is thus a religion of
self-transformation and self-improvement, through application of continuous
effort:
"Try to realise it's all within yourself
No one else can make you change."
[Within you without you, George Harrison, 1967]
In any case, there are subtle and pervasive forms of suffering
and impure states of mind even for rich and happy people. They also suffer
losses, disappointments and frustrations. They are also burdened with jealousy,
avarice, fear and desire. Yet, suffering is predominantly confined to the poor
and lower classes compared with the rich. One of the defining features of
working people is that they suffer more than average setbacks and
disappointments in their lives. They therefore form a good subject of study for
Buddhists. Their position in society gives one a justifiable sympathy towards
them, and one is predisposed to empathise with their suffering, even if a
strict Buddhist might contend that their suffering is the ripening of their own
bad karma [is their ‘own fault’] or that it is illusory in the deeper sense of
it being an aspect of a non-existent self that is a mental construct.
It can truthfully be said in Buddhism that meditation and
mindfulness on their own may not achieve selflessness, because employed alone
these forces do not directly counteract the ego. The ego must be tackled; it
must be subdued and diminished if true realisation is to occur:
"When you've seen beyond yourself then you may find
Peace of mind is waiting there."
[George Harrison, Within you without you, 1967]
For example, one can engage in meditation and mindfulness
for years, know all the great teachings by heart, and yet still remain innately
arrogant. This is because our sense of self is so persistent and so hard to
dislodge. In some of us, the self becomes too solid and we identify with this
mind, this body and the details of this life too tightly. We are then very
reluctant to let these elements go, to loosen their grip and let ego melt away:
"I built my prison stone by stone
how many useless knots I tied
I dug the pitfalls in my path
how many useless tears I cried."
[Robin Williamson, Cutting the Strings, 1970]
If we rely on these matters so much then our sense of self
is very powerful; if, however, we loosen our sense of identification with our
body, our mind and our position in life, making them slightly more distant and
less important, that is being non-attached to them, then the sense of self
becomes correspondingly diminished. But awareness then brightens and joy and
compassion actually become possible:
"You give all your brightness away and it only makes
you brighter."
[You get brighter every day, Mike Heron, 1967]
It seems one cherishes others to the degree that one no
longer over-cherishes the self:
"You never enjoy the world aright
Till the sea itself floweth
In your veins and you are clothed
With the heavens and crowned with the stars."
[Thomas Traherne]
This is the correct application of non-attachment and
mindfulness as spiritual antidotes of egotism. Whether through emptiness or
compassion, or patience, or giving, somehow or other one must release the grip
of the ego in order to achieve great realisations. There simply is no other
way.
It is the resistance the ego puts up against the realisation
of selflessness and emptiness that prevents us from gaining good insight. This
resistance can be enormous in those who have habituated a very solid
identification of their current consciousness and life situation with the
bright and empty awareness that underpins all life and flows through all
things:
"And to see you're really only very small
And life flows within you and without you."
[Within you without you, George Harrison, 1967]
Ego is terrified of its own extinction above all else. That
which flows through all things cannot be destroyed, thus no fear need arise.
When these ideas become fully absorbed and appreciated, it
then becomes possible to understand why Buddha was called the Subduer, the
World Conqueror, the Tathagata, the One-Gone-Thus, the World Honoured One, the
Great Sage of India, World Teacher and the One Gone to Bliss [Sugata] for truly
when ego is destroyed and a joyful and compassionate selflessness has emerged,
then mind has truly merged into bliss, which is Buddhahood.
trive to be "not attached to the pleasures of mundane
existence."
"craving cyclic existence thoroughly binds the
embodied."
"Emphasis on the appearances of this life is reversed."
"If you think again and again
About deeds and their inevitable effects
And the sufferings of cyclic existence,"
"generation of a complete aspiration to highest
enlightenment," which is the same as "the supreme altruistic
intention to become enlightened."
"Have entered into the iron cage of apprehending self
(inherent existence),"
"the realisation of emptiness," which is "the
cause and effect of all phenomena."
from Tsong Kha pa, Three Principle Aspects of the Path
No comments :
Post a Comment